How Risky Is India: Analyzing international investments in a time of financial and security crisis

1. Read "How Risky is India", an article from the December 4 issue of Businees Weekly at:

http://businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_50/b4112024094731.htm?chan=rss_topDiscussed_ssi_5. 

2. Summarize the article and explain how it reflects the structure of politics in India as well as the nation's relationship with Britain and the United States. 

3.  Mehul Srivastava and Nandini Lakshman (the authors) tell us that "Only in 2001, when a stable government focused on the economy with a brand message "India Shining" did things (economically speaking) take off." They then ask the reader "Which India will prevail- the India that nurtures global industries and rising affluence or the India of stalled hopes and endemic violence?"  Answer this question with regard for the information presented in the article. 

****If you need further help understanding the recent attacks in Mumbai and the conflict in Kashmir, check out the research and background links at : 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7754438.stm

Film Trailer Study

In order to help you think through the format of your Political Issue Documentary or Feature trailer project, you and your Production Team are asked to view and analyze at least SIX trailers from the links below. You must view at least two documentary and two feature trailers. These should be a mix of ametur and professionally produced films.

Features (trailers available for view in large format at www.spout.com/films):
City of God - street children in Brazil
Paradise Now- suiscide bombing
Maria Full of Grace- drug trafficking
Osama- women's rights in Afghanistan
Bread and Roses- immigrant worker rights/ labor organizing USA
The Last King of Scotland - dictatorship of Idi Amin in Uganda
Human Trafficking - self explanitory


Documentaries:
God Grew Tired of Us: children of war in Sudan: http://www.spout.com/films/God_Grew_Tired_of_Us/261762/921795/trailers.aspx

Sicko: Health care in US and Canada
http://www.spout.com/films/Sicko/284216/35687/trailers.aspx

Inheritance - an American woman comes to terms with the Nazi roots of her family's wealth: http://www.pbs.org/pov/pov2008/inheritance/index.html

Various POV doucmentaries are available for view at: http://www.pbs.org/pov/filmarchive.php

Several SHORT documentaries concerning global human rights issues are available for view at:www.mediathatmattersfest.org

Rights on the Line - Immigrant Rights:
http://www.mediathatmattersfest.org/7/rights_on_the_line_vigilantes_at_the_border/index.php?fs=about

Bread: Poverty in Guatemala:
http://www.mediathatmattersfest.org/6/bread/

Detailed study of a political or human rights issue in your nation of study

Map shown measures human rights restraints in nations around the world. Blue nations have the least restraints, red have the most.

Your final blog assignment for the second marking period is also the culminating project for this grading period. You will need to summarize three articles on a political and/or human rights issue in a nation of your choice in a historical or modern context. The issue or event you select will ultimately shape the film/documentary trailer you will be working on next marking period, so be sure you are genuinely interested in the topic.

The articles selected for this assignment must reflect international perspectives (they must be from the media of at least TWO different nations.)

Note: if you haven't completed the first part of this project, please select a nation and move forward with this assignment anyway. I'll be happy to help you chose one - just ask!

Some topics you might like to research include:

Effects and events of specific wars in your nation of study

Race based conflict and discrimination

Women’s suffrage/ voting rights

Universal suffrage/ voting rights

Impact of specific leaders and/ or dictators

Gender parity (difference) and/or discrimination

Labor issues, strikes, and unions

Genocide

Imperial rule and colonialism

Indigenous/ native rights

Terrorism

Health crises

Human trafficking (may be labor or sex work related)

Pollution, water and waste management

Poverty

Industrialization

Child rights issues (soldiers, labor, slavery, orphan crises, health crises, education and infanticide (killing of unwanted babies) are some issues you might chose to focus on)

For the purposes of this assignment you must:

• Locate and summarize three articles on the (1) issue you have chosen as it specifically relates to the issue/event you chose. Be sure to explain when and where this event had/is having the greatest impact, who is most directly affected by it.


• Explain how this event relates to the political system in place (or systems in conflict) of your nation of study


• Summarize the role of leaders in managing this issue. Evaluate his/her/ their role in relationship to this issue.


• Explain how this problem/event relates to the government case studies we’ve covered in class thus far (U.S., Iran, UK)


• Cite your three internet or printed articles in MLA format( http://www.easybib.com/ ) will format citations for you in MLA if you have the necessary information.
  

This assignment must meet a minimum of 600 words. It must be typed and may be either emailed to me, posted to the blog or submitted on paper.This will count as TWO blogs and follow the generic blog rubric that appears on the right side of this page under “blog rubric”.

Due: Wednesday December 3 before class.

5 bonus points will be added if you submit by Monday December 1.

OPTIONAL Extra Credit Assigment:Write a film synopsis and review of any of the following films:

In the Name of the Father

The Madness of King George

The Queen

Braveheart

Michael Collins

Directions:
1. Summarize the plot.
2. Explain what it reveals about the political history of the nations it relates to.
3. Draw connections between the film and the information you learned in one of our recent units. 4. Conclude by evaluating the film and stating whether or not you would recommend it to other Government students.

Prime Minister Politics 101

Last week many of you posed questions about why British Prime Minister Tony Blair has been replaced as head of Parlaiment by PM Gordon Brown. Here's your chance to find out and learn more about the legislative process in the United Kingdom.

Directions:

1. Read:

A) “Tony Blair to Resign in a Year”
ABC News
http://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=2405434&page=1

AND

One of the following articles and explore one of it’s hyperlinked sources (may be text, video, image or audio files):

B) Blair “My political journey is over” 5/10/07
CNN News
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/05/10/blair.announcement/index.html

OR

C) “British Prime Minister Announces His Resignation”
MTV News
http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1559212/20070510/index.jhtml

2. Summarize the articles, emphasizing the primary reasons UK Prime Minister Tony Blair voluntarily resigned in 2007s. Explain what these sources tell you about the role of the Prime Minister, his/her relationship with the Parliament and the role of political parties in the UK Parliament.

3. Answer one or more of the following questions:

• How does Blair’s resignation compare to the US Presidential resignations we’ve learned about in class (Nixon, Clinton and Jackson)?
• What does this say about the differences in the governments of the United Kingdom and the United States?
• Based on your knowledge and the articles, why did MP's and Britons believe Brown's policies would better serve the interests of the UK?

Your post must be a minimum of 250 words.

Be sure to comment or question a peer's response.

The Royal Crown in the modern world

This week we will be exploring the roles and responsiblities of the British Parliment. As discussed Friday, the leader of Parliment is the Prime Minister, and it is he or she who is essentially the exectuive leader of Great Britain. The Queen, however, remains the Head of State of the United kingdom and over a dozen independent commonwealths. Your blog this weekend asks you to analyze the changing and contested role of the British Monarchy in the modern world.

Directions: Actively read the articles below:

How the Commonwealth sees the Queen:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4922394.stm

The Queen admits monarchy must evolve to survive:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/the-queen-admits-monarchy-must-evolve-to-survive-650187.html

2. Summarize each article providing insight on what powers and influence the Queen has on British politics and culture.

3. Based on the articles, how has the Queen's political and cultural role and influence changed in recent history? Refer to at least three nations and multiple perspectives in your response.

Blog due Tuesday, November 11 (Veterans day- no class)

250 word minimum.

You may post, email, or print your response

Considering Iran, England and Nigeria: the implications of Sharia law in modern societies

Sharia law can be defined as a set of relilgious principles based on the Koran by which Muslims are required to live. Modern-day Iran, Lebanon, and Nigeria are some of the modern nations that use these laws ( Afghanistan had Sharia law under the Taliban.) Interestingly, a Chief Justice in Great Britain recently proposed the use of Sharia law in Britains' Muslim communities as a way to settle civil and domestic disputes. As we conclude our unit on Iran and prepare for upcoming units on Nigeria, England and Afghanistan the following articles pose interesting questions for comparative social science.

Directions:
1. Actively read the following articles:

A) "Sharia law SHOULD be used in Britain, says UK's top judge"By Steve Doughty Daily Mail Blogsite. July 4, 2008:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1031611/Sharia-law-SHOULD-used-Britain-says-UKs-judge.html

B) "Sharia law incompatible with human rights legislation, Lords say" by Afua Hirsch. UK Guardian, October 23, 2008:http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/oct/23/religion-islam2)

2. Watch the Frontline clip linked below (it is only two minutes) on Sharia law in Nigeria and one Nigerian's views on the system:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/muslims/portraits/nigeria.html

3. Summarize the main ideas of all three sources. Evaluate the arguments for and against Sharia legal systems as presented in the articles. Then, consider all you have learned from this assignment and our current unit in Iran to present your own opinion on Sharia law in the modern world.

Your post should be at least 250 words and include a response to at least one other classmate, on this or another block's blog.

Work due Wednesday, November 5 (same day as test on US and Iran)

Please remind your loved ones to vote!

Can a theocracy be democratic? Analyzing the politics of religion in Iran

Article 1 of the Iranian Constitution reads:

The form of government of Iran is that of an Islamic Republic, endorsed by the people of Iran on the basis of their longstanding belief in the sovereignty of truth and Koranic justice, in the referendum of 29 and 30, March 1979, through the affirmative vote of a majority of 98.2% of eligible voters, held after the victorious Islamic Revolution led by Imam Khumayni.  

Iran's population is 89% Shia Muslim, 9% Sunni Muslim, and 2% split among Judaism and Zoroastrian (the oldest monotheistic religion). As we learned in class, Iran is a theocratic regime that has democratic elements. (See BBC's "Iran, who holds the power?") This week's blog requires you to analyze some primary and secondary source documents on the experiences of religious minorities in Iran. 

Directions: 

1. Summarize two of the articles on the "Pilgrimage Through Iran" site  (you'll have to click on two of the locations and view the articles/ videos or photo essays.)

The URL is: http://news21project.org/story/2007/07/26/interactive_map_pilgrimage_through_iran

What do they tell you about the experiences of religious minorities in Iran? 

2. Consider the demographics of modern Iran. In a nation where over 90% of the population is Muslim can one argue that a constitution based on the Qu'ran IS democratic? Further, when a nation overwhelmingly favors one belief system, are democracy and theocracy one in the same? (In other words, does it make sense to have religious law when a vast majority of citizens share the same beliefs?)